Revisão disciplinar analisará pena de censura ao juiz pelo TRF-5, seguindo precedentes do CNJ em casos similares nesta terça-feira.
O CNJ determinou, hoje, 25, o afastamento do juiz Orlan Donato Rocha, de Mossoró/RN, sob acusações de intimidação ou assédio sexual. A decisão do Conselho inclui a abertura de uma revisão disciplinar para avaliar a adequação da censura reservada aplicada pelo TRF-5.
No segundo parágrafo, é crucial abordar a importância de combater qualquer forma de assédio, intimidação ou importunação sexual no ambiente de trabalho. A sociedade deve ser vigilante e promover um ambiente seguro e respeitoso para todos, rejeitando veementemente qualquer ato de assédio ou intimidação sexual.
Investigation of Sexual Harassment Allegations Leads to Judge’s Suspension
The National Ombudsman, Luis Felipe Salomão, emphasized the seriousness of the facts reported in the testimonies of six victims. According to the minister, at first glance, a reprimand does not seem appropriate, warranting a more severe punishment in compliance with CNJ precedents in similar cases. Therefore, he believes that the case should be reviewed, and the judge should be suspended for a proper investigation of the facts until the best course of action is determined. The councilors supported the ombudsman unanimously.
Judge Orlan Donato Rocha is suspended by the CNJ after allegations of sexual harassment. The case originated from one of the victims who approached the Harassment Prevention Committee of the RN Judicial Section to file a complaint. Following her, five other victims testified that the magistrate had displayed inappropriate, improper, and embarrassing behavior. At TRF-5, Judge Joana Carolina’s vote reportedly detailed the conduct of the accused, highlighting the victims’ testimonies. Minister Salomão referenced this vote.
During the testimonies, one of the women, who worked as a maid, recounted how the judge followed her while she was leaving coffee on the table. In other instances, he mentioned putting on glasses to see better and stared at her body with insinuations, made persistent calls to the pantry, complimented her body, asked about her evening plans, requested a hug, and hugged one of the victims. In one testimony, the woman mentioned that when it happened to her, colleagues said, ‘everyone knew it would happen.’ The ombudsman stressed that in cases of potential sexual harassment, the victim’s testimony must be given special consideration and should only be disregarded if it lacks coherence with other collected evidence – which was not the case here.
It is now up to the council to review the case and, if necessary, reconsider the imposed penalty. Case: 0000026-05.2022.2.00.0405.
Fonte: © Migalhas
Comentários sobre este artigo